Quantcast The Mac Weekly
College Media Network

Current Issue:

Portishead back after eleven year hiatus

By: Peter Valelly, Arts Editor

Issue date: 4/11/08 Section: The Arts
  • Print
  • Email

Portishead's new album "Third," out April 28, somehow seemed destined to fail, hopelessly uncool and totally out-of-place. Sure, the Bristol, UK group's 1994 debut "Dummy" has long been canonized as one of the great albums of the '90s. But its ostensible genre, "trip-hop," has largely been recognized as the sonically turgid and poorly named fraud that it was. Meanwhile, the group's underwhelming self-titled second album was released in 1997, leaving a decade-long gap in their studio output.

In October, in the shadow of Radiohead's monstrous "In Rainbows" charade, Portishead announced that their third studio album, called simply "Third," would be released in 2008. The news seemed to come long after the band's listening audience had forgotten they existed. Indeed, here was a comeback that pretty much no one was asking for.

Improbably, then, "Third" is a triumph. Rather than rehash the morose "Dummy," the new record accelerates and intensifies that album's emotional pain. At points, the record seems so trenchantly melodramatic that it eclipses and escapes the actual range of human emotion.

While singer Beth Gibbons' choked, fraught vocals play a part, this surreal and feverish tone is particularly established by the album's awesomely inorganic sonic architecture. On cavernous single "Machine Gun," the sound is something like '80s industrial via dubstep, a childhood nightmare surgically assembled from the most doom-laden sounds available. Amid punitive synth drums and Gibbons' wailing, the song's mid-range frequencies splinter and shred the way that bass sounds tend to do on shitty headphones. The sonically startling track is one of many on the album that tease and dodge conventional notions of genre - a quality that music desperately needs in 2008.

Album opener "Silence" brims with similar invention. Its rolling and crackling rhythms grind away in the bass registers, seemingly detached from the static-drenched swaths of strings. Gibbons' vocals are particularly harsh here, so closely recorded that every consonant sound hisses. The melody is lovely and laden with agony as the song builds to its dissonant conclusion.

"Hunter," meanwhile, is wrought alternately from steady beauty and from roaring distortion. It's one of many delicate, forgettable tracks which seem strategically placed to set up the album's uneasy climaxes. "We Carry On," for example, is nauseous and harsh - not to mention spiked with an atonal guitar solo so abrupt that, on my first listen, I thought someone had put on another CD simultaneously - but somehow seems more of a mood piece than a masterpiece. The short, mostly acoustic "Deep Water" is interrupted with strange choral moments, making it from a folk song into something slightly off-kilter.
Page 1 of 2 next >

Article Tools

Be the first to comment on this story

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

Poll

How should Macalester cover its losses in the financial crisis?
Submit Vote

View Results

Advertisement